Rent tribunal decisions in BH24, Ringwood
1 published rent tribunal decision in BH24 (Ringwood). What landlords proposed, what the First-tier Tribunal set and why, linked to GOV.UK.
Regulated-tenancy (Rent Act 1977) decisions in BH24 (Ringwood), kept separate from Section 13 figures.
New rules Notices from 1 May 2026
No decisions under the new rules in BH24 (Ringwood) yet. The first were published from June 2026; challenges to notices served now will follow.
Earlier rules Notices before 1 May 2026
No market-rent decisions under the earlier rules in BH24 (Ringwood).
Raising rents in BH24 (Ringwood)? Abide.Rent checks each proposed rent against local evidence and tribunal outcomes before you serve.
Start your free trialEvery recent decision
The latest 1 of 1. Open one for the figures, the evidence and the tribunal’s reasons.
| Decided | Where | Paid before | Proposed | Set | Outcome | Rules |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 Jun 2019 | New Street, Ringwood BH24New Forest | — | — | £637 | Registered | Fair rent |
Decisions by month
Last 12 months with a published decision. Tribunals publish weeks after deciding, so the latest month fills in over time.
What came up
Not enough detail in the published decisions here.
Counted from the text of market-rent decisions. Older decisions often publish the rent only, without reasons.
Fair rents (regulated tenancies)
1 Rent Act 1977 decisions in BH24 (Ringwood), median £637 a month, 0 limited by the Maximum Fair Rent Order. A different law from Section 13.
| Decided | Where | Paid before | Proposed | Set | Outcome | Rules |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 Jun 2019 | New Street, Ringwood BH24New Forest | — | — | £637 | Registered | Fair rent |
Nearby districts
Reading these decisions
- Each decision values one home on the evidence in front of the tribunal. It is not a rent for the street.
- A confirmed rent under the new rules means the market was at least that high; the tribunal could not go higher.
- The tribunal can set a rent below what the tenant already pays, usually for condition or a weak evidence pack.
Tenants: is my rent increase notice valid? Landlords and agents: tribunal risk checker · all new-rules decisions.
Questions agents and landlords ask
How many rent tribunal decisions are there in BH24 (Ringwood)?
1 published decisions: 0 on notices under the Renters’ Rights Act rules, 0 under the earlier rules and 1 fair-rent decisions for regulated tenancies. The list is refreshed daily from GOV.UK.
Does the tribunal usually cut rent increases in BH24 (Ringwood)?
There are no new-rules decisions here yet. Across England, 65% of new-rules decisions set the rent below the notice, with a median cut of −5.7%.
Can the tribunal set a higher rent than the landlord proposed?
Not for notices served from 1 May 2026. The tribunal sets the open-market rent or the notice figure, whichever is lower, and the new rent starts from the decision with no backdating. Under the earlier rules it could go higher, which is why the two are shown separately.
How should I price a rent increase in BH24 (Ringwood)?
Start from rents actually achieved for similar homes nearby, recent and close, then adjust for condition, furnishing and what is included. Tribunal decisions show the risk of getting it wrong; they are not a price list. Keep the comparables and condition record before you serve the notice.
Serve rent increases in BH24 (Ringwood) that survive a challenge
- Every proposed rent checked against local tribunal outcomes before the notice goes out
- Form 4A prepared, served and proven, with the 52-week clock tracked per tenancy
- Comparables, condition and service record bundled for the tribunal as you go
Source: every First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) rent decision published on GOV.UK, read by Abide.Rent and refreshed daily (last 23 Oct 2026). Street, town and postcode district only; open any decision for the tribunal’s published reasons on GOV.UK. Rents are shown a month; weekly rents are converted (× 52 ÷ 12). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Decisions are evidence of risk, not a price list. Not legal advice.